Coalition

The bookies and pundits are putting Fine Gael and Labour together as the new government.  Fair enough, the figures add up.

But, as I have argued before, would Labour really be using their political strength to make the required difference.  The prospect of partnership must be seductive to the Labour leadership.  In previous coalitions they have managed to introduce good policy.  Justin Keating was a good Minister, as was Michael D Higgins.

But we are in extraordinary times.  The economic model favoured by successive governments has been shown to be inherently flawed. There can be no argument against the evidence that the gap between rich and poor in Ireland is huge.  There had been a consensus in the so-called centre ground that in fact was way to the right of centre. 

There is an opportunity for people who came into politics to fight inequality and make the world a fairer place to take a lead in shifting the political paradigm.  

For the record and as a matter of interest, I am going to reprint extracts from a contribution that I made to a debate within Sinn Féin about the merits or otherwise of a coalition with Fianna Fail.  As it transpired, the matter didn't arise, but the arguments still resonate today - just swap party names around a bit and remove some of the time-specific references.

There is the added factor of the banking collapse and the failure of deregulation to consider now and this makes the need for leadership from progressive parties and individuals all the more pressing.

What is political strength? BY VINCENT WOOD
 Article date June 2005

The recent debate on Coalition options that have manifested in the pages of An Phoblacht have focused on the working out of potential electoral strength and its possible impact on our struggle.

This is an intelligent debate conducted from a left perspective and is therefore particularly welcome. However, I would be worried that the debate has created the premature expectation that we may be in a position where such an option is likely in the short term. By that, I don’t mean that numbers won’t necessarily stack up or that we won’t be asked. It is that I don’t believe that we are ready to be a prominent voice in any possible coalition yet. The nature of the debate so far also gives undue credence, in my opinion, to the notion that electoral strength equates to political strength.



Therefore, the daunting, but necessary task we should set ourselves is to go above, around and under the entrenched and mostly hostile establishment, forge alliances and begin the process of winning hearts and minds towards progressive and revolutionary ideas.

Jim McVeigh, in his recent article, is right to point out that we need to dialogue with the grass roots of the left. For let’s not make any bones about it, it must be the left that we work with. This will entail a process of engagement and yes, it will take time, possibly years, to break down prejudice and circumvent the vested interest of the trade union/Labour Party leaderships.

There is an understandable fear that arguments that break consensus are open to ridicule by the establishment parties and their friends in significant sections of the national media. But it is clear to me that the small number of vociferous political luminaries and their media fellow travellers overestimate their influence on the greater number of people. However much these people try to present a Joe Higgins, George Galloway, Tony Benn or Gerry Adams as marginalised lone voices, there is public empathy and understanding of the anti-establishment positions taken.  Many people are actually crying out for public investment at a greater level and greater commitment to plan for social inclusion. In other words, socialism (though that is not the terminology that is finding currency out there, but sin scéal eile). The fact remains many people are up for it.

The translation of this understanding into electoral support presents a challenge and we should, of course, continue to develop the party in this respect, but this, like so much of what we need to do, may take some time. Better that it does take more time than risk losing sight of idealism or principle.

Making a short-term tactical decision to coalesce with Fianna Fail, for example, would be seen by the Irish people as unprincipled and as support for the status quo, whichever way we try to suggest otherwise. Any such move at this stage would entail some acceptance of a system that is inherently failing the people. There is no room for growth there. It’s a crowded field.

There is no political leadership on this island that currently measures up in terms of the absolute need to baulk the system and say what needs to be said about the erosion of the quality of life of the citizens of Ireland/Europe/the World and who are willing to break with the neo-liberal model. Some people argue that dealing in this paradigm is accepting Realpolitik. But if there is something rotten with that political reality, should we lend it credence or work for real change?

There is no way that neo-liberalism will or can deliver on equality. Michael McDowell summed it up succinctly when he stated that inequality was a good thing. Capitalism collapses without inequality.

As a measure of how far back basic advances are undermined by the right, look how the most rudimentary tenets of social democracy are under attack. The recent voting down of the EU Constitution by the French people has been almost universally reported by commentators and political parties here as a peculiar anomaly, where people defiantly and stupidly stood up for a 35-hour week and some understanding of society, rather than economy, as if this is some form of ancient madness.

Strong opposition by a party with a profile like ours to the neo-liberal consensus, which would certainly entail staying away from government with active proponents of it, could offer a significant platform for real opposition. There is a strong sense of the social out there and an understanding that this untrammeled capitalist project is negatively impacting on the quality of life of many and is positively condemning others to perpetual misery. We need to work on how to connect with all of that. The public airing of honest and decent political ideas in that context would have a significant impact.
.

There has never been a more important time to present a radical alternative vision for the world. Much of the gains made for working people during the 20th Century and taken for granted by our generation are under attack by the Thatcherite policies championed by most political parties under the cover of what passes for the political norm or what is presented as the need to practice ‘realpolitik’. There is a need for real leadership here. ...